CONTINUEThis site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
  1. Front Page
  2. News By Topic
  3. WIPO SCT Meets

WIPO SCT Meets

by Ulrika Lomas, for LawAndTax-News.com, Brussels

20 November 2007


New types of marks, such as holograms and scent marks, trademark opposition procedures, and questions relating to the registration of industrial designs topped the agenda of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications (SCT).

The 18th session of the SCT, which met from November 12 to 16, 2007, was attended by 74 member states, 3 intergovernmental organizations and 11 non-governmental organizations, and focused on key issues that aim to establish more clarity for the international protection of trademarks and industrial designs.

The Committee considered the approaches adopted in the legislation and trademark office practice of member states in relation to the registration of “non-traditional marks” such as three-dimensional marks, color marks, sound marks, scent marks, movement marks, hologram marks, slogans or position marks.

This work will continue at the SCT’s next session, which, it is anticipated, will identify specific areas of convergence in the law and practice of member states in respect of these types of marks. This work aims to provide insights and guidance to the trademark offices of member states and to users of the trademark system in relation to the treatment of such marks in the trademark registration process.

The SCT also considered an in-depth analysis of various aspects of trademark registration opposition procedures which offer third parties the opportunity to object to a trademark either before or after it was registered with a trademark office.

Delegates worked on a set of key approaches regarding issues such as the grounds of opposition, third-party observations made in the course of opposition procedures, cooling off periods allowing for settlement negotiations, member states’ experience with introducing new opposition systems and the effect the abolition of office examination as to prior rights can have on the number of oppositions filed.

As a result, the Committee will consider, at its next session, a document identifying areas of convergence between various national and regional offices concerning opposition procedures.

With regard to industrial designs, meanwhile, the SCT continued its analyses of industrial design registration in member countries. The Committee gave the go-ahead for the second stage of a comprehensive survey on various industrial design registration systems, covering questions of substantive design law.

The first part of the survey, which covers design registration formalities, is well under way and a substantial amount of data has already been collected by the secretariat. This exercise is expected to result in the mapping of the industrial design protection landscape of member states, and was launched by the SCT at its 16th session in (November 2006).

Delegates also took note of the enhancement of certain aspects of the procedure for the protection of state emblems and names and abbreviations of international organizations under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property.

The secretariat informed the meeting about the successful launch of a new on-line searchable database containing some 2,400 records of protected state emblems and names, abbreviations and emblems of intergovernmental organizations. These signs are generally not available for trademark use.

The database does not have any legal effect and inclusion of signs is of a purely informative nature. However, this tool is widely seen as a means of improving public access to this data and thereby enhancing the protection of these signs against unauthorized registration or use as trademarks.

Finally, with regard to International Nonproprietary Names for Pharmaceutical Substances (INNs), the Committee noted the past cooperation between the secretariats of WIPO and the World Health Organization (WHO), which, in the SCT’s area of work, had led to the distribution to trademark offices of WIPO member states, by the SCT secretariat, of cumulative lists of INNs.

Under a WHO program, INNs provide a common generic designation of given pharmaceutical substances and in accordance with relevant WHO resolutions, INNs should not be registered as trademarks. SCT members have expressed great interest in obtaining better information on INNs and the extent to which they should be considered non-proprietary.

The SCT secretariat was mandated to follow up on this issue with the WHO secretariat, with a view to continuing this work at the next session of the SCT, which will take place from June 2 to 6, 2008.

TAGS: Italy

To see today's news, click here.

 















Tax-News Reviews

Cyprus Review

A review and forecast of Cyprus's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Cyprus Review »

Malta Review

A review and forecast of Malta's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Malta Review »

Jersey Review

A review and forecast of Jersey's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Jersey Review »

Budget Review

A review of the latest budget news and government financial statements from around the world.

Visit Budget Review »



Stay Updated

Please enter your email address to join the Tax-News.com mailing list. View previous newsletters.

By subscribing to our newsletter service, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.


To manage your mailing list preferences, please click here »