CONTINUEThis site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
  1. Front Page
  2. News By Topic
  3. US Treasury Aims To Lower FATCA Burdens

US Treasury Aims To Lower FATCA Burdens

by Mike Godrey, Tax-News.com, Washington

30 January 2012


During her remarks at the New York State Bar Association Annual Meeting, Acting Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy, Emily McMahon, indicated that regulations for the implementation of the provisions of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) are in the final stages of clearance at the United States Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

FATCA was enacted by Congress in March 2010 and is intended to ensure that the US tax authorities obtain information on financial accounts held by US taxpayers, or by foreign entities in which US taxpayers hold a substantial ownership interest, at foreign financial institutions (FFIs). Failure by an FFI to disclose information would result in a requirement to withhold 30% tax on US-source income.

Under the current timeline, an FFI must enter an agreement with the IRS to provide information on each account and US account holder by June 30, 2013, to ensure that it will be identified as a participating FFI in sufficient time to allow withholding agents to refrain from withholding beginning on January 1, 2014.

Due diligence requirements for identifying new and pre-existing US accounts (including certain high-risk accounts, such as private banking accounts with a balance that is equal to or greater than USD500,000) will begin in 2013, and reporting requirements will begin in 2014.

FFIs across the world (including banks, investment funds and insurance companies) have all expressed concern about the legislation, in particular the costs of compliance and penalties that will ensue in case of non-compliance.

However, McMahon has now said that Treasury and the IRS “are keenly aware that FATCA imposes significant new requirements and responsibilities on foreign financial institutions. We have received extensive input from the financial community and from practitioners on the challenges posed by these new requirements, and many useful suggestions on how to implement them.”

“As a result,” she confirmed, “we believe that significant progress has been made over the past year, such that FATCA can in fact be implemented in a manner that is not overly burdensome, when compared to its benefits, and that it can over time serve as a complement and a catalyst to the ongoing global efforts to combat offshore tax evasion.”

She pointed out that FATCA “came about as the result of a series of events in 2008 and 2009 involving very serious instances of offshore tax evasion,” and that those events “made clear that significant gaps remained in the system – in particular with regard to the reporting of foreign source income earned by US persons from offshore accounts, and the identification of US owners of foreign entities. It also became clear that some US investors had exploited those gaps to hide income and assets offshore.”

She added that it became obvious that identifying US taxpayers who earn foreign source income through offshore accounts would require the cooperation of FFIs. She considered it “understandable” that both FFIs and foreign governments have expressed concerns about the burdens imposed by FATCA, relative to what they perceive as the potential benefits, but believed that, in response, “we have sought from the beginning to minimize [the] burden to the extent we can, consistent with the objective of combating the use of offshore accounts to evade US tax.”

McMahon confirmed that “we understand that compliance with any new reporting or withholding requirements requires lead time for FFIs to reconfigure their computer systems, adjust their procedures, and inform their customers. We recognize that the industry has much to contribute, and we welcome ideas for achieving a smooth transition.”

Towards that end, the proposed FATCA regulations seek to further minimize the administrative burden of FATCA and better focus its application on circumstances that present a higher risk of tax evasion, for example by setting higher dollar thresholds. Furthermore, for new accounts, she disclosed that the proposed regulations seek to align, as far as possible, the review required for FATCA purposes with the procedures that FFIs already follow to comply with anti-money laundering and know-your-customer rules.

To further focus the FATCA implementation efforts on higher-risk institutions, MacMahon also disclosed that the IRS has expanded the categories of FFIs that are “deemed compliant” with FATCA, as well as the previously announced exception for retirement plans. In recognition that global FFIs face a variety of obstacles, the proposed regulations will also provide temporary relief from the requirement that all members of an affiliated group be participating or deemed compliant FFIs.

She then confronted the other challenge presented by FATCA in that “certain of its key components conflict, to varying degrees, with privacy or other laws in many countries”. In some countries, for example, FFI’s may be unable – under their country’s existing laws - to comply with the core requirement that they report customer information directly to the IRS.

In recognition of this problem, McMahon indicated that the US is “open to exploring an intergovernmental approach to FATCA implementation that would address legal impediments to direct reporting. To that end, Treasury’s international team has already begun conversations with a number of our major trading partners about bilateral approaches to overcome legal impediments and facilitate compliance.”

A key element of these efforts, she said, has been to explore the possibility that FFIs of a particular country could report the information required by FATCA to their home country government, which would then transmit the information to the IRS. She pointed out that the US already has a network of agreements providing for tax information exchange with more than 60 countries.

In fact, the Treasury and the IRS believe that their efforts “to implement FATCA and to resolve the challenges it poses can and should serve as precursors to a more comprehensive multilateral approach to information exchange. For that reason, we believe that FATCA – if implemented appropriately – can serve as a catalyst for further advances in the global effort to improve transparency and combat tax evasion.”

A comprehensive report in our Intelligence Report series, examining in depth the situation of offshore transparency and secrecy in a number of the most prominent jurisdictions, is available in the Lowtax Library at http://www.lowtaxlibrary.com/asp/subs_reports.asp and a description of the report can be seen at http://www.lowtaxlibrary.com/asp/description_report2.asp
TAGS: compliance | tax | investment | business | offshore confidentiality | tax information exchange agreement (TIEA) | tax compliance | law | banking | insurance | retirement | investment funds | international financial centres (IFC) | Internal Revenue Service (IRS) | offshore | agreements | legislation | offshore banking | banking secrecy | withholding tax | United States | regulation | penalties

To see today's news, click here.

Leave a comment

Read our Posting Guidelines

No financial institution will ever be able to know without a doubt which of their customers are "US persons". They take many disguises: the one that is born outside to the US to one or both US parents who's birth certificate belies their status, the hapless snow bird who overstayed their visit to the US, the green card holder who returned to their home country but did not fill out the proper forms with Homeland Security and the IRS upon departure, those from elsewhere who have become US citizens and have subsequently left, etc, etc, get the picture? The most frightening prospect is the notion that a customer may have to prove they AREN'T a US person, to prove a negative! The witch hunt must end.

bubblebustin on Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Its worrying that Emily McMahon doesn't appear to understand how tax information exchange agreements work. The US can't simply go on a fishing expedition with the counterparties to these agreements. For these agreements to be effective, the US must first exhaust all local means of collecting the information it requires and must therefore have deatils of (a) the US taxpayer and (b) the institution in the foreign country that the account is with, among other things. The Tax Information Exchange route will simply not work.

GB on Monday, January 30, 2012

 






Close

Password Reminder

Please enter your email address to receive a password reminder.

 

Log into Tax-News+
Not registered yet? Find out about our daily news alert service »

 Email: 
 Password: 

Login »

Forgotten your password?







Tax-News Reviews

Cyprus Review

A review and forecast of Cyprus's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Cyprus Review »

Malta Review

A review and forecast of Malta's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Malta Review »

Jersey Review

A review and forecast of Jersey's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Jersey Review »

Budget Review

A review of the latest budget news and government financial statements from around the world.

Visit Budget Review »



Tax-News+ Updates

Receive FREE daily updates from Tax-News.com, straight to your inbox. Register Now!

For a tailored solution, choose to receive selected news updates for your preferred jurisdictions and topics, with our enhanced Tax-News+ subscriber service. Read more...

 

Stay Updated

Please enter your email address to join the Tax-News.com mailing list. View previous newsletters.

By subscribing to our newsletter service, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.


To manage your mailing list preferences, please click here »