CONTINUEThis site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
  1. Front Page
  2. News By Topic
  3. UK Anti-Avoidance Provisions May Catch Non-Doms, Says CIOT

UK Anti-Avoidance Provisions May Catch Non-Doms, Says CIOT

by Robert Lee,, London

30 November 2007

The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) has suggested that certain anti-avoidance provisions may be extended by the UK government to cover companies and trusts set up by non-domiciled individuals.

Commenting on the possibility that non-doms, who are already facing substantial changes to their tax regime, may be included in the rules, John Barnett, CIOT spokesman, warned that this may provide another reason for wealthy and highly-mobile foreigners to leave the UK.

"As well as introducing a GBP30,000 charge for non-doms, the pre-Budget report (PBR) proposals also made vague reference to extending certain anti-avoidance provisions which do not currently affect non-doms. Although it is not entirely clear, we understand that under this heading the government may be contemplating changing the CGT treatment of offshore trusts and companies set up by non-doms," he stated.

"While it may be tempting to seek to raise additional tax from non-doms in this way, it needs to be recognised that the non-dom population are, by definition, highly internationally mobile and in many cases can choose to invest in foreign rather than UK businesses and assets," he added.

The CIOT is concerned that if there are changes of the type mooted, there will be no additional tax raised. The organisation is urging the government to defer CGT changes for trusts and companies set up by UK resident non-domiciliaries until a proper assessment can be made of the impact on the UK economy.

Barnett continued: “There is a significant danger that non-doms will move their investments out of the UK and potentially even relocate altogether. The loss to the UK economy as a whole might be substantial. The City of London could be particularly affected as could other specific sectors such as the international art market (which could easily relocate to New York or elsewhere)."

"The CIOT believes that potential changes of this sort are of an entirely different magnitude to the GBP30k proposals and should not be enacted without a careful study of the economic effects. The CIOT hope that, if the suggestions as to the direction of change are indeed correct, implementation of any proposals is deferred until, say, April 2009 to allow for proper study and consultation. This would coincide with other aspects of the proposed changes which are already set to be delayed until that date."

The CIOT argues that the principles of fairness, competitiveness, simplicity and certainty in the tax system should apply as much to non-doms as to other areas of the tax system.

"While there is sometimes a balance to be struck between these principles, we fear that the change which may be being contemplated would produce a 'worst of all worlds' rather than a well-chosen compromise," Barnett observed.

"We have already raised these concerns with the government in more detail, and intend to provide further details of the difficulties surrounding change in this area in response to the government's promised consultation," he concluded.

To see today's news, click here.


Tax-News Reviews

Cyprus Review

A review and forecast of Cyprus's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Cyprus Review »

Malta Review

A review and forecast of Malta's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Malta Review »

Jersey Review

A review and forecast of Jersey's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Jersey Review »

Budget Review

A review of the latest budget news and government financial statements from around the world.

Visit Budget Review »

Stay Updated

Please enter your email address to join the mailing list. View previous newsletters.

By subscribing to our newsletter service, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

To manage your mailing list preferences, please click here »