CONTINUEThis site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
  1. Front Page
  2. News By Topic
  3. OECD Releases Seven Dispute Resolution Peer Review Reports

OECD Releases Seven Dispute Resolution Peer Review Reports

by Ulrika Lomas,, Brussels

15 April 2020

The OECD has released new stage two peer reviews on seven countries' implementation of the BEPS Action 14 minimum standard, on improving tax dispute resolution, covering Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, and Sweden.

The reports evaluate the progress made by the seven jurisdictions in implementing any recommendations resulting from the jurisdictions' stage 1 peer review reports. The stage 2 monitoring takes into account any developments in the period April 1, 2017, to September 30, 2018, and the MAP statistics are based on years 2016 and 2017.

According to the OECD, the results from the peer review and peer monitoring process demonstrate positive changes across all seven jurisdictions, although not all show the same level of progress.

Highlights include:

  • The Multilateral Instrument was signed by all seven jurisdictions and has already been ratified by five of them, which brings a substantial number of their treaties in line with the standard. In addition there are bilateral negotiations either ongoing or concluded;
  • All jurisdictions now have a documented notification/bilateral consultation process to be applied in cases where an objection is considered as being not justified by their competent authority;
  • Austria, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and Sweden have added more personnel to the competent authority function and/or made or initiated several organizational improvements (for example, more face-to-face meetings between competent authorities) with a view to handling MAP cases in a more timely, effective, and efficient manner;
  • Austria, Germany, and Sweden decreased the amount of time needed to close MAP cases and Liechtenstein and Luxembourg met the sought-after 24-month average timeframe to close MAP cases;
  • Austria introduced legislative changes to ensure that all MAP agreements can be implemented notwithstanding domestic time limits if the treaty does not provide for it, while in five of the other six this is already the case; and
  • Austria, Germany, Luxembourg, and Sweden have updated or clarified issues in their MAP guidance.

The OECD is now working on a ninth batch of Action 14 peer reviews.

TAGS: tax | Liechtenstein | Luxembourg | agreements | transfer pricing | Austria | France | Germany | Italy | Sweden | BEPS

To see today's news, click here.


Tax-News Reviews

Cyprus Review

A review and forecast of Cyprus's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Cyprus Review »

Malta Review

A review and forecast of Malta's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Malta Review »

Jersey Review

A review and forecast of Jersey's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Jersey Review »

Budget Review

A review of the latest budget news and government financial statements from around the world.

Visit Budget Review »

Stay Updated

Please enter your email address to join the mailing list. View previous newsletters.

By subscribing to our newsletter service, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

To manage your mailing list preferences, please click here »