CONTINUEThis site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.


Close

Password Reminder

Please enter your email address to receive a password reminder.

 

Log into Tax-News+
Not registered yet? Find out about our daily news alert service »

Email Address: 
Password: 

Login »

Forgotten your password?


Today’s Top Headlines




'Backpacker Tax' Would Cut Australian Visitor Numbers

by Mary Swire, Tax-News.com, Hong Kong

23 August 2016

Australia will become a less attractive destination to travellers if the Government presses ahead with its plans for a "backpacker tax," according to a new study by Monash University.

The Government this month launched a review of working-holiday-maker tax rules. It fulfils pre-election commitments made by the Government in response to the backlash against its proposal to reform the tax residency rules to treat most working holiday visa holders temporarily in Australia as non-residents for tax purposes. This would have prevented such individuals from accessing the tax-free threshold, meaning that those affected would have been taxed at 32.5 percent on income between AUD1 (USD0.76) and AUD80,000.

The research was conducted by Dr Jeff Jarvis at Monash University's National Centre for Australian Studies, and budget accommodation network YHA, and concerned the motivations of working holiday makers. Nearly two-thirds (60 percent) of those questioned said they would not have travelled to Australia if they faced a 32.5 percent tax rate, and 57 percent said they would spend less time travelling in the country if the changes were to take effect. In addition, 70 percent said that they would look for cash-in-hand jobs to avoid the so-called "backpacker tax."

The research also concluded that New Zealand would benefit from the changes, with 62 percent of those surveyed saying that, had the Australian tax been in effect, they would have considered taking a working holiday in New Zealand instead. Canada was likewise identified as a major competitor, with 53 percent considering it an alternative destination. The number of those willing to recommend Australia to fellow working holiday makers was just 22 percent, compared with 75 percent prior to the changes being announced.

Jarvis said: "It is clear that the proposed tax changes will have a significant impact on potential demand for Australia as a backpacker destination, with 60 percent of working holiday makers surveyed indicating that they would not have come on such a visa if the tax rate was 32.5 percent. In addition, only just over one-fifth of travellers would recommend to their friends to come to Australia on a working holiday maker visa and 57 percent would spend less time travelling around Australia. That means there would be a significant impact, in particular on regional tourism economies."

TAGS: individuals | tax | budget | Australia | tax thresholds | tax rates | Canada | New Zealand | tax reform | individual income tax | Work

To see today's news, click here.

Leave a comment

Read our Posting Guidelines

Backpackers pay the same tax as everyone else working in Australia. In most countries people are treated as tax residents if they spend there more than 6 months a year. That's common practice around the world. No one has any privileges here. What they want to do is discriminatory. I don't understand why government wants to treat them worse. I am potential backpacker in Australia. Sorry I probably was, cause it's not only that I have to pay airfare from Europe + riddiculously high visa fee + 500 USD for required TOEFL certificate (as I'm from non-english speaking country) and then work my ass off in a job that no one else wants I'd have to pay more than other people doing the same job and pay normal AUS prices in the store while making less than normal minimum wage probably. It's also psychological effect. When I think that if I'd go this year I could earn 100 and going next year for the same effort I'd have to give 1/3 of my money to government for doing literally nothing for me then it doesnt make sense. And the truth is in reality youll feel it even more painful as youll probably get the same accomodation and basic spending, so it's the savings we have to look at. Hypothetically basic expenses are 50. Then instead of having 50 savings you'll have 17. That's a huge cut. Imagine at the end of the stay you have 1700 AUD left instead of planned 5k. You can buy airfare back home... Good luck to people who'll decide to go. You are brave

Matt on Friday, August 26, 2016