CONTINUEThis site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
  1. Front Page
  2. News By Topic
  3. BAA Loses Key UK VAT Case

BAA Loses Key UK VAT Case

by Robin Pilgrim, LawAndTax-News.com, London

30 June 2011


The UK's Upper VAT Tribunal has ruled that British Airports Authority (BAA) Limited was not entitled to recover VAT that had been incurred in connection with its takeover by parent company Airport Development Investments Limited (ADIL). BAA had previously been successful in the First Tier Tribunal but HM Revenue and Customs has been successful in its appeal of the decision.

The issue concerned the timing of a sequence of events surrounding the takeover of BAA by the consortium's parent company, ADIL. Prior to the takeover, ADIL entered into negotiations with third parties to secure finance, and these discussions continued after the takeover. In the intervening period, ADIL joined the BAA VAT group and the VAT incurred on various costs associated with the takeover was claimed by the VAT group."

HMRC challenged the recovery of the VAT on the grounds that it related to investment costs incurred by ADIL in raising finance to acquire BAA, and that there was no immediate link between the supplies on which the VAT was incurred and any VATable supplies made by the BAA VAT group.

The Upper Tier Tribunal found that ADIL had no intention of making a taxable supply at the time the VAT was incurred and therefore could not rely on the VAT grouping provisions to assist its cause. In order for a business to reclaim VAT, the tax must form a cost component of a taxable supply. The Tribunal agreed with HMRC that there was no direct and immediate link to an onward taxable supply and therefore the VAT could not be reclaimed.

Lorraine Parkin, Head of Indirect Tax at Grant Thornton UK, said of the ruling:

“This is an important decision for any business involved in an acquisition or merger. The Tribunal did not accept that ADIL was carrying on an economic activity which spanned the completion of the acquisition of the BAA group of companies. As such, the VAT on services that ADIL started to incur prior to joining the VAT could not be reclaimed under its subsequent VAT group registration with BAA."

“An important feature of this decision is that ADIL did not have any evidence to support its intention to join the BAA VAT group or to make any taxable supplies. Businesses involved with this type of transaction would therefore be wise to think about the VAT implications at an early stage. My advice to clients is that a formal company record should be kept about any intention to register a bidco for VAT and the role that it will play in the management of the new corporate group.”

TAGS: court | tax | business | value added tax (VAT) | aviation | HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) | HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC)

To see today's news, click here.

 















Tax-News Reviews

Cyprus Review

A review and forecast of Cyprus's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Cyprus Review »

Malta Review

A review and forecast of Malta's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Malta Review »

Jersey Review

A review and forecast of Jersey's international business, legal and investment climate.

Visit Jersey Review »

Budget Review

A review of the latest budget news and government financial statements from around the world.

Visit Budget Review »



Stay Updated

Please enter your email address to join the Tax-News.com mailing list. View previous newsletters.

By subscribing to our newsletter service, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.


To manage your mailing list preferences, please click here »