Mobile phone giant Vodafone could be forced to pay a USD2bn bill for unpaid tax in India after the High Court in Mumbai ruled in favour of the tax authorities in a long-running dispute.
The British-based company is being chased over taxes relating to its USD11bn purchase of Indian operator Hutchison Essar from Hong Kong based Hutchison Telecommunications International Ltd (HTIL) in 2007, with the Indian tax authorities alleging that Vodafone has failed to pay a huge capital gains tax (CGT) bill incurred as a result of the acquisition.
Vodafone argues that, since it was the buyer, the capital gains tax liability should be assessed against HTIL. Vodafone has also pointed out that the sale took place between foreign entities and therefore it has no such tax liability in India.
The Vodafone/Essar deal was structured so that Vodafone International Holdings, a Dutch-registered subsidiary of Vodafone Group, made the USD11bn payment to a Cayman Islands-registered subsidiary of HTIL, in order to acquire the 67% stake in Hutchinson Essar.
Despite these claims, Vodafone's appeal has been dismissed by the High Court, which has given the company a further eight weeks to appeal the judgment. Despite the temporary reprieve granted to Vodafone, many observers fear that the zealous pursuit of the company for back taxes could deter other foreign investors from investing in India, particularly those seeking to acquire Indian companies.
.
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment