The US Congress is squaring up for a final battle over the long-term future of the tax cuts enacted in last year's $1.6 trillion package. As it passed into law, the package contained 10-year cuts in various taxes which would then be reversed in 2011. The House of Representatives has already passed a bill which would make these cuts permanent at an additional cost to 2012 of $373 billion, but the Senate is now considering a bill which would single out just the estate tax for permanent removal at a cost of $99 billion.
For the Democrat-controlled Senate to prefer cutting the estate tax (widely held to apply mostly to richer people) to other taxes such as the marriage tax ($16 billion), the new 10% tax bracket ($79 billion), or the expanded child tax credit ($35 billion), requires some explanation, and it is presumably to be found in the lobbying system.
Estate-tax repeal would stand no chance of repeal if it didn't have substantial support among Democratic senators, given the need for 60 votes to overcome a filibuster. There are however said to be eight or nine Democrats, including Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, who are preparing to support the measure, which will come up for a vote later this week.
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle thinks he still has a good chance of keeping enough of his unruly flock in line to keep the measure from getting 60 votes, but everything is still to play for in the coming days.
.
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment