This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here.  
  • Delicious


Close

Password Reminder

Please enter your email address to receive a password reminder.

 

Log into Tax-News+
Not registered yet? Find out about our daily news alert service »

Email Address: 
Password: 

Login »

Forgotten your password?


Today’s Top Headlines




US Internet Sales Tax Bill Reintroduced In Congress

by Mike Godfrey, Tax-News.com, Washington

12 March 2015

A bipartisan group of US Senators has re-introduced the Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA), which would give states the option of levying sales taxes on internet transactions.

Currently retailers are only required to collect sales tax in US states where they also have brick-and-mortar stores (that is, a physical nexus). State and local governments are said to view the taxes they cannot collect on most online sales as lost revenue, and the National Conference of State Legislatures previously calculated that the present "loophole" costs USD23bn in uncollected taxes each year.

The MFA was approved by the previous Congress's Democrat-led Senate on a bipartisan basis in May 2013. The MFA would give states the option to require online retailers with national annual sales greater than USD1m to collect the tax, even if their websites lacked a physical nexus in the state.

The MFA was sent for approval to the Republican-led House of Representatives where it encountered a great deal of opposition, particularly on the grounds that it was considered to create new taxation and onerous compliance requirements. It then stalled in the House Judiciary Committee, and can also be expected to attract strong Republican opposition in the current Congress.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R – Virginia) has proposed an alternative system of taxing "remote sales" in an attempt to overcome his colleagues' doubts. His draft legislation would create sales tax obligations based on where the retailer – not the customer – is located, but the proposal has also encountered criticism and is unlikely to be introduced in the short term.

Arguing in favor of the Bill, one of its sponsors, Mike Enzi (R – Wyoming), the Chairman of the Senate's Budget Committee, said that "thousands of local businesses are forced to do business at a competitive disadvantage because they have to collect sales and use taxes and remote sellers do not. The MFA would put Main Street businesses on a level playing field with online retailers."

Another sponsor, Assistant Senate Democratic Leader Dick Durbin (D – Illinois), added that "we came close in the last Congress, but the Bill was never acted on in the House of Representatives. I hope that, in the 114th Congress, we can do what's right for businesses around the country."

Discussions on the taxation of internet sales has also been stimulated by Justice Anthony Kennedy's additional comments within the recent US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decision in Direct Marketing Association v. Brohl (13-1032), on the 1992 "pre-internet sales boom" SCOTUS ruling, known as the Quill decision, that established the physical nexus ruling.

Justice Kennedy noted that "there is a powerful case to be made that a retailer doing extensive business within a state has a sufficiently 'substantial nexus' to justify imposing some minor tax-collection duty, even if that business is done through mail or the internet," and suggested that "it is unwise to delay any longer a reconsideration of the Court's holding in Quill."

TAGS: court | compliance | tax | business | sales tax | commerce | law | internet | e-commerce | legislation | United States | retail

To see today's news, click here.

Leave a comment

Read our Posting Guidelines

Interesting thought U.S Legislator are contemplating to impose Sales tax. Whereas the U.S Companies (Amazon) doing business in India, says Indian Tax Authorities are impeding their business, by asking them to follow the existing VAT legislations. Indian Govt. in some States have introduced amendments to levy VAT on e-tailers in the state where Orders are delivered. Thax

Sanjay on Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Good article! Hopefully states won't opt to levy the tax, especially considering that in two independent case studies states who did so saw online sales drop by 9% (source: BDO Consumer Business blog).

KM on Friday, March 13, 2015