The UK's RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors) is objecting violently to the Government's intention to make construction industry insurance intermediaries register with the FSA (Financial Services Authority) under the EU Insurance Intermediary Directory, which in broad terms obliges Member States to regulate such intermediaries.
Says the Government: All insurance and reinsurance intermediaries must be registered
with a competent authority in their home Member State. Insurance undertakings
and other bodies may collaborate with the competent authorities in registering
intermediaries. The register must specify the names of the natural persons in
the management who are responsible for the mediation business. By making insurance
and reinsurance mediation a regulated activity, all firms (unless exempt or
persons to whom section 19 FSMA does not apply) must obtain authorisation from
the FSA to carry on such activities.
RICS says: 'The proposals to impose FSA Regulations across the entire insurance
market is a knee-jerk reaction demanding a "one size fits all" solution
in areas of
the market where regulation is inappropriate or simply not needed. Construction
related insurance is a complex, specialised subject requiring a full understanding
of how the construction industry works and a detailed knowledge of the various
Standard Forms of Contract. Advice in this area is best provided by those who
work on a day-to-day business with the organisations involved and who have the
appropriate knowledge and training.
'Chartered Surveyors and other professionals working within the construction
industry will be faced with the prohibitive cost and additional time required
to comply with the proposed FSA Regulations. Such advisors will either simply
"opt out" of providing such professional advice or alternatively pass
the additional cost on to clients in the form of extra fees. The whole issue
as it affects the construction industry is counter-productive. The very people
the Regulations are designed to protect
will be denied the opportunity to obtain the best possible advice from those
in a position to provide it or will have to pay more fees for the advice they
get.'
RICS has written to the Chancellor, Gordon Brown, to protest, saying:
'In our view the way that this directive is being implemented is one of the worst examples we have ever seen of a sledgehammer being applied to crack a nut. A great amount of regulation, which will be both costly and cumbersome to implement, is being applied to tackle what appears to us to be a largely non-existent problem. We do not consider that there is any significant problem in the UK relating to the operation of insurance in the property and construction spheres nor do we feel that the Directive necessitates the kind of 'platinum-plating' that the UK Government seems determined to give it. We simply do not understand why the UK Government has decided to go far beyond what was strictly necessary and apply this directive in ways that other countries do not appear to feel necessary. The net result is likely to be a withdrawal of smaller firms from areas like property management, something which is presumably not the Government's objective.'
.
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment