A coalition of groups representing the UK music industry has called for the introduction of a 'Value Recognition Right', to be imposed on ISPs which 'profit' from illegal file sharing.
The proposed Right would be in the form of a license fee, to be paid to rights holders by ISPs and other intermediaries to compensate for the file-sharing activities of their customers.
At a meeting in London last Wednesday, at which the BPI was notable by its absence, bodies including the Association of Independent Music and the Musicians' Union explained in a joint statement that:
"Presently music creators are not being paid when their music is distributed over unauthorised file-sharing networks. At the same time, consumers are being sued for infringing copyright when they use such services."
"Between the two, sit digital operators (such as Internet Service Providers (ISPs), mobile companies and device manufacturers) that profit extensively and reap wider value from the unauthorised distribution of music whilst being protected from liability by a series of legal immunities and safe harbours."
Proposals regarding the levy are expected to be submitted to the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property later this year.
However, the suggestion has, not unexpectedly, been angrily condemned by ISPs and digital rights groups.
Commenting on the matter to the UK media last week, Suw Charman of the Open Rights Group slammed the proposed charge as "ill-conceived and grasping"
.
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment