On May 21st, the Swiss will vote in a referendum on a series of bilateral accords worked out between Switzerland and the EU over a number of years, and covering many aspects of the single market, including freedom of movement and transport.
Two Swiss parties have voted on the referendum in recent days, both unanimously - one to oppose it, and one to support it.
The 55 delegates of the Liberal party, meeting in Berne said 'yes', and the 118 delegates of the right-wing Swiss Democrats, meeting in Wil, not surprisingly said 'no' - it was this party that called for the referendum in the first place.
The Swiss have previously voted against joining the EU, and many of them see the 'Accords' as little different from full-out joining. But increasingly Switzerland is in an impossible position on many levels, landlocked and surrounded by EU countries which want to (and do) cross its territory with enormous and growing volumes of people and trucks, while its financial 'products' such as investment funds need access to the EU market-place. Eventually it will be impossible for the Swiss to resist the extension of their existing links with the EU, but the jury is still out on whether this will be the time it happens.
Recent polls show the 'yes' camp in the lead with about 53% in favour of the 'bilaterals' as they are called, while 45% are against.
See an extensive analysis of the choice facing Switzerland (in French) in the Tribune de Geneve at:
.
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment