Letters from Congressmen and other leading figures opposing the OECD's harmful tax competition initiative continue to rain down on the heads of the Republican administration - last week in perhaps the most powerful blast yet, the President received a letter from 200 top economists including two Nobel laureates, Milton Friedman and Jim Buchanan:
May 31, 2001
The Honorable George W. Bush
President
The United States of America
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20500
Dear President Bush,
We, the undersigned economists, urge you to reject the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's so-called "harmful tax competition" initiative. According to the OECD, it is unfair for low-tax countries to attract jobs, capital and entrepreneurial talent away from high-tax countries. To stop this process, the Paris-based bureaucracy is threatening low-tax nations with financial protectionism unless they change their tax and privacy laws so that high-tax nations can more easily double-tax income that is saved and invested - even when that income is earned in other nations.
This is a completely misguided initiative. Tax competition is a liberalizing force in the world economy, something that should be celebrated rather than persecuted. It forces governments to be more fiscally responsible lest they drive economic activity to lower-tax environments. Other reasons for our opposition include:
The OECD seeks to create a tax cartel - Consumers benefit and the economy
is more efficient when gas stations, banks, pet stores, and car companies
compete. The same thing is true for government. Competition promotes efficiency
and encourages lawmakers to rationalize public finance.
The OECD is threatening global commerce - Protectionism is a bad idea,
and it is a really bad idea when the goal is to interfere with international
capital flows. The OECD effort is akin to a high-tax state like California
trying to block investment dollars from flowing to a low-tax state like
Nevada.
The OECD proposal will boost the underground economy - Instead of propping
up uncompetitive tax systems, criminalizing tax competition will simply
drive taxpayers into the informal economy. A low tax burden, by contrast,
will reduce incentives to hide, shelter, and under-report income.
The OECD is defending bad tax policy - In order to minimize tax-induced
distortions, the tax code should neither subsidize nor penalize different
activities. Yet the OECD initiative is driven by a desire to help high-tax
nations double-tax income that is saved and invested.
The OECD will hurt growth in less-developed nations - Penalizing countries
for adopting market-friendly tax systems will hinder economic reform and
reduce growth rates in the developing world. This may even cause more
crime since opportunities for honest employment will shrink.
Mr. President, we ask again that you stop the OECD's ill-conceived project.
As the world's largest economy and single largest contributor to the OECD's
budget, the United States has the ability to pull the plug on this unwise
proposal.
Sincerely,
Milton Friedman,
Nobel Laureate, Hoover Institute
Jim Buchanan,
Nobel Laureate, George Mason University
198 other economists also signed the letter.
.
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment