MEPs last Thursday adopted a resolution on the future of European patents.
They voted by 494 votes in favour, 109 against and 18 abstentions to postpone any decision on whether to approve the Community accession to the European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA), and called for "significant improvements" to the text.
During the debate on the matter held in Strasbourg in late September, Internal Market Commissioner, Charlie McCreevy advocated the ratification of the Agreement, arguing that it would make the European patent system more effective.
With the Community Patent dossier blocked in the Council for lack of agreement
over the language regime, the Commission had put forward the proposal of acceding
to the EPLA. The EPLA would introduce a European Patent Court with jurisdiction
to deal with infringement concerning European patents. The EC accession to the
agreement would therefore allow the Court to rule over patents in all EU Member
States.
The majority of the MEPs did not reject the idea of acceding EPLA outright,
but stressed their reservations over the present form of the draft text. They
revealed that they were particularly concerned about the lack of democratic
control over the procedures to grant a patent.
To counter these concerns, MEPs asked for significant revision of the provisions
of the Agreement, with regard to democratic control, judicial independence and
litigation costs. Moreover, MEPs asked the EP Legal Service to give its advice
on the possible overlap between the EPLA and the acquis communautaire.
MEPs agreed that the best way to improve patent protection in the EU is to have
a Community Patent, but acknowledged that it is unlikely that the proposal will
be approved in the near future.
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment