The UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA) on Tuesday published a consultation paper which proposes that insurance companies will no longer be permitted to charge compensation for mis-selling to the inherited estates of with-profits funds.
The proposals relate specifically to proprietary firms and not mutuals.
FSA rules currently allow firms to pay the costs of compensation and redress from the inherited estates of their with-profits funds.
The FSA revealed that it has re-examined these rules, and has concluded that there is a case to consult again on whether shareholders alone should meet the cost of compensation and redress, as the current rules may not lead to the fair treatment of policyholders.
The inherited estate is the part of the with-profits fund that is judged to be surplus to what is needed to meet the fund’s liabilities.
It is retained as working capital by firms, but may in future be distributable to policyholders.
Inherited estates have built up over the years from different sources: premiums from past generations of policyholders and associated investment returns, and/or past capital injections from shareholders.
FSA rules already require firms to consider whether they have an ‘excess surplus’ in a with-profits fund that should be distributed to policyholders.
The consultation will close on 3rd September 2008, and a policy statement giving feedback on the consultation is due to be published before the end of the year.
.
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment