The European Commission has formally requested that eight member states amend their legislation with regard to the application of their value-added tax (VAT) grouping schemes.
These requests have been directed to the governments of the Netherlands, Ireland, Spain, Finland, Sweden, the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic and Denmark, and come in the form of a reasoned opinion, the second stage of the infringement proceedings provided for in Article 226 of the European Treaty. If these member states fail to comply with the reasoned opinion within two months, the Commission may refer the matter to the Court of Justice of the European Communities.
Article 11 of the VAT Directive gives member states the option, for the purpose of administrative simplification, to regard as one single taxable person those who, while legally independent, are closely bound to one another by financial, economic and organizational links.
In July 2009, the Commission adopted a Communication on the VAT grouping option provided for in the VAT Directive. The Communication set out the Commission's view on how the provisions of Article 11 of the VAT Directive should be translated into practical arrangements whilst respecting the basic principles of the Community VAT system and ensuring that the effects of using the option scheme remain restricted to the member state applying it.
The proceedings against Sweden concern the fact that Sweden limits the VAT grouping system to financial and insurance services. That is also one of the grievances in the proceedings against Finland. According to the Commission, the VAT grouping rules in the VAT Directive do not allow for such a sectoral limitation.
Further, the other grievance in the proceedings against Finland concerns the fact that Finland allows the inclusion of non-taxable persons into a VAT group. The proceedings against Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain, the United Kingdom, Denmark, and the Czech Republic concern the same issue. All these member states allow non-taxable persons to join a VAT group which, according to the EU, is not in line with the proper application of Article 11.
For the Netherlands, the proceedings also include the failure to notify changes to the application of their VAT grouping scheme to the VAT Committee.
.
Archive
| Resources | Partners
| Site Map | Links
| Newsletter
Archive | Contact
| RSS Feeds
About | Syndication |
Advertising & Marketing |
Recruitment |
Terms & Conditions |
Privacy
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
All content provided by BSI Media
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment