In the ongoing dispute regarding Germany's new telecom law, the European Commission on Thursday sent a reasoned opinion, the second stage of infringement proceedings.
According to the EC, Germany has failed to remove new provisions in German law that could grant Deutsche Telekom a 'regulatory holiday' in spite of its dominant position in the broadband market.
The Commission's reasoned opinion is the last step before referring the case to the European Court of Justice. Germany will only have one month to reply.
The EC confirmed that:
"The infringement procedure launched at the end of February concerns amendments to the German telecoms law that entered into force that month. These amendments could lead to an effective exemption of Deutsche Telekom AG’s fast internet access network (VDSL) from competition. Such ‘regulatory holidays’ would be granted without consulting the Commission and regulatory authorities in other Member States, as is mandatory under EU telecom rules to ensure transparency and a better functioning internal market."
"Germany adopted the rules in question despite the Commission's early warnings that they were incompatible with EU rules."
When launching the infringement proceedings the Commission reiterated its well-known view that the new German law jeopardises the competitive position of Deutsche Telekom's existing competitors and makes it much harder for new competitors to enter German markets.
The Commission emphasised that the new provisions also attempt to limit the discretion granted to the German telecoms regulator (the 'Bundesnetzagentur') under EU rules which allows it to decide, on the basis of an in-depth market analysis, whether or not to allow competitors access to the new VDSL-network currently being built by Deutsche Telekom.
Germany replied to this letter only after the Commission ultimately agreed to prolong the deadline given to Germany by a further 15 days. However, Germany was still not willing to amend the telecoms law to take account of the Commission's concerns, and continued to defend the disputed provisions.
.
Network Tweets
Network BlogsContent
provided by
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment