A discussion document released on Thursday seeks views on whether the law should allow limited streaming of imputation credits to those who can use them and refunds of credits for charities and other tax-exempt entities in New Zealand.
"The discussion document is the first step in a process of consultation on possible
improvements to two important areas in the imputation rules of the Income Tax
Act,” Finance Minister Michael Cullen and Revenue Minister Peter Dunne
said on Thursday.
“Imputation credits are credits attached to dividends for income tax that
has been paid by the company in which shares are held. New Zealand shareholders
who pay tax in New Zealand can use imputation credits to offset their income
tax," they continued, going on to add:
“The focus of the discussion document is on those imputation credits that
cannot be fully used under current law – either because the recipient
is a foreign shareholder or because the recipient is a New Zealand organisation
that is exempt from income tax.
“Our tax law does not permit ‘streaming’ of imputation credits,
which means directing credits away from those who cannot use them to those who
can. That is to protect the revenue base. Without anti-streaming rules, it would
be easy, for example, to devise arrangements that resulted in foreign investors
in New Zealand companies not paying tax in New Zealand on the income they derive
here.
“For the same reason there is no question of allowing refunds of imputation
credits to foreign shareholders in New Zealand companies. Doing so would effectively
allow them to pay no tax on their New Zealand income.
“There are strong grounds for preventing streaming and possibly even for
strengthening our anti-streaming rules. At the same time, the government would
like to hear people’s views on whether the anti-streaming rules inhibit
valid commercial transactions and whether streaming should be allowed in some
circumstances."
The Ministers then went on to state:
“Similarly, the government is prepared to consider the case for refunding
imputation credits to organisations that have a specific exemption from New
Zealand income tax, such as registered charities.
“The discussion document seeks comment on whether the lack of refunds
for imputation credits affects the type of investments that tax-exempt organisations
make, whether refunds could be made to work in some circumstances, and what
might be better alternatives to refunds.
“A very important influence on the outcome of this review is the possibility
of our entering negotiations with Australia to establish a system of mutual
recognition of imputation and franking credits for trans-Tasman investment.
As announced last month, that question is now formally on the agenda, which
is a very significant development. If mutual recognition does proceed, it would
be sensible to make our anti-streaming rules as compatible as possible. This
could obviously affect the outcome of this review.
“Even if mutual recognition were not to proceed, any moves to allow limited
streaming in New Zealand would have to be discussed with Australia under our
existing trans-Tasman imputation arrangements," they explained, concluding:
"The questions raised in the discussion document will be of particular
interest to shareholders, charitable organisations, tax professionals, fund
managers and others who are interested in developing New Zealand’s capital
markets. We urge them all to express their views on these important matters."
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment