The proposed merger of the Toronto and London Stock exchange operators has been backed by a key group of Canadian business representatives in an open letter which also slams the rival deal offered by the Maple consortium.
With just days to go before a crucial TMX Group shareholder meeting, the letter offers strong endorsement of the TMX-London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) transaction. The deal is compared with the bid tabled by the Maple group of Canadian banks and pension funds, and the latter offer is heavily criticised. The list of businessmen party to the letter includes fund managers, capital market investors and financial planners.
The TMX-LSEG merger is praised for its ability to protect "Canadian regulatory sovereignty", champion Canadian executive management, and maintain both competition and a level playing field. On the other hand, the letter argues that Maple "has proposed the creation of a national monopoly in which our Canadian exchanges would be owned and managed by many of their most powerful participants, and thus would be burdened by significant conflicts".
The Maple proposal faces "significant regulatory hurdles", but, were these overcome, the consortium would be in possession of nearly 90% of all equities trading in Canada, according to the letter. This would create "a small and highly connected group of financial institutions", which would own and control Canadian exchanges and capital markets. The net effect is that such exchanges and capital markets would be ill-served, and market competition would be "virtually eliminate[d]".
Furthermore, the letter notes, "Maple's highly leveraged, tightly-held TMX would have significant control over virtually every aspect of access to financing in Canada. We believe this will negatively impact fees, enforcement, regulation, innovation and transparency." Ultimately, it concludes: "Such concentration of ownership is not in the interests of our capital markets and economy."
The full list of signatories is as follows:
The TMX Board of Directors rejected last week the latest of Maple's bids, on the grounds that it did not constitute a superior proposal to the LSEG transaction, nor could it reasonably be expected to do so in future. LSEG recently upped its offer, adding a special cash dividend to the deal. Under the newest proposals, the special cash dividend would be worth 84.1 pence per share for LSEG shareholders, and CAD4 per share for TMX. Based on share capital as at June 20, this sweetener would be worth GBP415.8m, or CAD660.3m (USD665m).
The balloting of TMX shareholders concludes on June 28, and the shareholder meeting will take place on June 30, where shareholder judgement on the LSEG deal will be passed.
Maple Group Acquisition Corporation was formed by a group of five pension funds, and four of Canada's leading banks in reaction to the LSEG proposals. The membership was originally as follows: Alberta Investment Management Corporation; Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec; Canada Pension Plan Investment Board; CIBC World Markets Inc.; Fonds de solidarité des travailleurs du Québec; National Bank Financial Inc.; Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board; Scotia Capital Inc., and TD Securities Inc. Maple recently added Desjardins Financial Group, Dundee Capital Markets, GMP Capital Inc. and Manulife Financial to its list of investors.
.Tags: investment | business | capital markets | mergers and acquisitions (M&A) | stock exchanges | Canada | United Kingdom | regulation | Canada
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment