Ruling on Tuesday, the US Supreme Court supported the Federal Communications Commission's assertion that cable broadband providers should not be obliged to share their lines with internet service providers.
In October 2003, a three-judge panel at the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the FCC was wrong to effectively absolve cable companies of the obligation to share their networks with rival providers.
In the 39 page ruling, the judges argued that the FCC was wrong when it decided to categorise cable broadband providers as 'information services' for regulatory purposes, thus subjecting them to much lighter regulation.
The appellate court found that the cable broadband firms were also partly providing 'telecommunications services', and should therefore be subject to the greater obligations which come with this.
However, in a 6-3 decision delivered on Tuesday, Supreme Court justices stated that the FCC was right to classify cable broadband providers as information services rather than telecommunications services.
.
|
Archive | Resources | Partners | Site Map | Links | Newsletter Archive | Contact | RSS Feeds | About | Syndication | Advertising & Marketing | Recruitment | Terms & Conditions | Privacy & Cookies
Copyright © 2012 - All Rights Reserved - Tax-News.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Tax-News.com has taken reasonable care in sourcing and presenting the information contained on this site, but accepts no responsibility for any financial or other loss or damage that may result from its use. In particular, users of the site are advised to take appropriate professional advice before committing themselves to involvement in offshore jurisdictions, offshore trusts or offshore investments.
Write a comment