The release by the Clinton administration
of proposed changes to U.S. encryption regulations has been met
with disappointment by the U.S. high tech industry. Although the
Government has proposed the relaxation of the current export restrictions
on cryptography products, industry representatives and privacy
advocates have said that the changes don't go far enough as significant
controls would remain in place.
The export restrictions currently
in place are the result of opposition by U.S. law enforcement
agencies to the free distribution of cryptography products without
Government agencies having access to their keys. While the proposed
changes will ease licensing controls on retail software products,
they do not go as far as Vice President Al Gore had originally
promised.
One item on which the Government
did keep its promise to the industry was the reversal of its position
on open (public) source code, which under the proposed changes
will be subject to the same treatment as retail products. But
the major source of concern by industry groups about the proposed
new regulations is the lack of clear definitions and restrictions
on products that are sold to government agencies, including telephone
and other semi-government utilities.
The head of industry lobby group
Americans for Computer Privacy, Ed Gillespie said "Two months
ago we were looking at a clean lifting of export restrictions.
Now we are looking at a complicated mass of regulations." A lawyer
for the Electronic Privacy Information Center, David Sobel, said
the proposed changes did not constitute 'decontrol' and would
be more complex to administer because the proposed new regulations
lift license and review requirements for consumer products, but
still requires Commerce Department reviews in some circumstances.