The Office of the United States Trade Representative on Monday published this
year's edition of the Special 301 report on the perceived adequacy and effectiveness
of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection by US trading partners.
“Innovation is the lifeblood of a dynamic economy here in the United
States, and around the world. We must defend ideas, inventions and creativity
from rip off artists and thieves,” explained US Trade Representative Susan
C. Schwab, adding:
“This report underscores the Administration’s scrutiny in pinpointing
challenges in protecting IPR and signals to our trading partners that effective
IPR protection will remain a critical focus in US policy.”
As in previous years, the USTR’s Special 301 report highlighted the
prominence of concerns with respect to China and Russia, in spite of some evidence
of improvement.
The USTR explained that:
"Russia remains a focus of US trade policy in the area of intellectual
property. Large-scale production and distribution of IP-infringing optical media
and minimally-restrained Internet piracy are among the major problems that require
more enforcement action."
"The coming months will be a critical period, as Russia moves to implement
a variety of legal and law enforcement improvements to which it committed as
part of a bilateral agreement with the United States on Russia’s eventual
accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). Implementation of these commitments
will be essential to completing the final multilateral negotiations on the overall
accession package."
However, the department added that:
"Russia made ambitious commitments to improve its IPR protection and enforcement.
As part of the Special 301 report, USTR is also announcing an out-of-cycle review
to evaluate Russia’s progress."
Similar out-of-cycle reviews will be carried out with respect to Brazil, the
Czech Republic and Pakistan.
In conjunction with the release of the report, USTR announced the results
of an unprecedented year-long review of strengths and weaknesses in IPR protection
and enforcement in key Chinese provinces.
“Leadership at the provincial and local levels is critical to improving
China’s IPR climate,” Schwab explained. “By highlighting local
problems and also giving credit where it is due, we encourage local leadership.”
While the US continues to work with China in many fora to strengthen that country’s
IPR regime, high levels of copyright piracy and trademark counterfeiting remain
of concern. The US recently sought consultations under the WTO to address a
number of discrete deficiencies in China’s IPR regime. The US has since
been joined by Canada, EU, Japan, and Mexico as third parties in these consultations.
“Our recent decision to pursue IPR-related concerns in China through
consultations under WTO dispute settlement rules demonstrates our determination
to defend vigorously American innovation,” commented Schwab.
The Special 301 report also provided an opportunity for the US to recognize
progress. Brazil is being moved to the Watch List (from Priority Watch List),
reflecting significant improvements in copyright enforcement, and five other
trading partners – Bahamas, Bulgaria, Croatia, the EU, and Latvia –
are being removed from the Special 301 listing altogether.
This year’s Special 301 report places 43 countries on the Priority Watch
List (PWL), Watch List (WL) or the Section 306 monitoring list.
Countries on the Priority Watch List are not deemed to provide an adequate
level of IPR protection or enforcement, or market access for persons relying
on intellectual property protection. In addition to China and Russia, 10 countries
are on the PWL in this year’s report: Argentina, Chile, Egypt, India,
Israel, Lebanon, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, and Venezuela.
Thirty trading partners are on the lower level Watch List, meriting bilateral
attention to address the underlying IPR problems. The Watch List countries are:
Belarus, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic,
Ecuador, Guatemala, Hungary, Indonesia, Italy, Jamaica, Korea, Kuwait, Lithuania,
Malaysia, Mexico, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Saudi Arabia,
Taiwan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.
Paraguay will continue to be subject to Section 306 monitoring under a bilateral
Memorandum of Understanding that establishes objectives and actions for addressing
IPR concerns in that country.