A change to the UK's Controlled Foreign Company rules buried in last week's
pre-budget statement will cost companies issuing extended warranties through
offshore 'captive' insurance companies hundreds of millions of pounds in extra
corporation tax.
As a result, credit rating agency Moody's has placed electrical retailer Dixons
on review for a possible downgrade. Moody's said that although Dixons had a
robust operating performance, it was worried about the group's stretched financial
profile following the recent €368m (£236m) UniEuro acquisition in
Italy.
Last week's ruling, effective immediately, changed the status of extended warranty
contracts issued by offshore insurance companies so that they no longer meet
the 'Exempted Activities Test' (EAT) which allows some types of offshore profit
to escape CFC taxation. The contracts for extended warranties are usually between
the captive insurer and the UK retail client, so that the UK retailer is not
a party to the contract, and until now this has been enough for the usually
very profitable warranty contract to obtain EAT exemption.
Dixons estimated the cost at £20m in extra tax, and other hardware retailers
will also suffer. Kingfisher, which owns the Comet chain, said its tax bill
could rise by between £6m and £8m, while Carphone Warehouse forecast
a £2m hit.
PwC said: "Insurance products of this sort are inherently very profitable.
The Inland Revenue evidently saw this kind of structure as involving the diversion
offshore of profits which arose from a sale of the underlying goods or services
by the UK retailer. The Revenue clearly felt that such profits should have been
taxable in the UK as they arose, rather than being accumulated tax-free in a
"captive insurer". Prior to these changes, such arrangements could
only be attacked on transfer pricing grounds."