The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) has suggested that certain anti-avoidance
provisions may be extended by the UK government to cover companies and trusts
set up by non-domiciled individuals.
Commenting on the possibility that non-doms, who are already facing substantial
changes to their tax regime, may be included in the rules, John Barnett, CIOT
spokesman, warned that this may provide another reason for wealthy and highly-mobile
foreigners to leave the UK.
"As well as introducing a GBP30,000 charge for non-doms, the pre-Budget
report (PBR) proposals also made vague reference to extending certain anti-avoidance
provisions which do not currently affect non-doms. Although it is not entirely
clear, we understand that under this heading the government may be contemplating
changing the CGT treatment of offshore trusts and companies set up by non-doms,"
he stated.
"While it may be tempting to seek to raise additional tax from non-doms
in this way, it needs to be recognised that the non-dom population are, by definition,
highly internationally mobile and in many cases can choose to invest in foreign
rather than UK businesses and assets," he added.
The CIOT is concerned that if there are changes of the type mooted, there will
be no additional tax raised. The organisation is urging the government to defer
CGT changes for trusts and companies set up by UK resident non-domiciliaries
until a proper assessment can be made of the impact on the UK economy.
Barnett continued: “There is a significant danger that non-doms will
move their investments out of the UK and potentially even relocate altogether.
The loss to the UK economy as a whole might be substantial. The City of London
could be particularly affected as could other specific sectors such as the international
art market (which could easily relocate to New York or elsewhere)."
"The CIOT believes that potential changes of this sort are of an entirely
different magnitude to the GBP30k proposals and should not be enacted without
a careful study of the economic effects. The CIOT hope that, if the suggestions
as to the direction of change are indeed correct, implementation of any proposals
is deferred until, say, April 2009 to allow for proper study and consultation.
This would coincide with other aspects of the proposed changes which are already
set to be delayed until that date."
The CIOT argues that the principles of fairness, competitiveness, simplicity
and certainty in the tax system should apply as much to non-doms as to other
areas of the tax system.
"While there is sometimes a balance to be struck between these principles,
we fear that the change which may be being contemplated would produce a 'worst
of all worlds' rather than a well-chosen compromise," Barnett observed.
"We have already raised these concerns with the government in more detail,
and intend to provide further details of the difficulties surrounding change
in this area in response to the government's promised consultation," he
concluded.