In spite of massive
external pressure and a sway in public opinion, Switzerland appears
to be clinging to its famous, even revered banking secrecy. Although
a survey earlier this year showed that 60 per cent of Swiss wanted
banking secrecy abolished in cases of tax fraud, and 80 per cent
wanted Switzerland to cooperate with other countries investigating
tax evasion, the rejection of a money laundering bill by the lower
house of the Swiss parliament this month is proof enough that
banking secrecy will be a difficult nut to crack. Now finance
minister Kaspar Villiger, who strongly opposed the bill put forward
by left-wing lawmaker Christian Grobert, has stated quite categorically
that Switzerland will not give up its age-old asset.
So the Swiss government
has reiterated its commitment to a policy of banking secrecy,
despite growing international criticism. Mr Villiger is not going
to win himself any friends within the OECD and FATF, the organisations
bent on stamping out tax evasion and money laundering. To be fair,
Switzerland has made a certain effort to tackle money laundering,
but private banking in the Alpine country is like a brick in a
wall. Take it out and you don't know quite what's going to happen.
The Swiss economy is hugely reliant on the financial sector, namely
its banks, and besides, Switzerland has no desire to rid itself
of one of its greatest traditions.
Mr Villiger says
doing away with banking secrecy is not necessary in any case as
Switzerland is doing all it can not to encourage financial crime
through confidentiality. Speaking in Geneva, he expressed anger
at the cliched view of Switzerland as a money laundering paradise
and repeated that banking secrecy was not negotiable. Mr Villiger
said: 'Theres no chance of Switzerland being forced to abandon
this principle, at least as long as were cooperating in
an efficient way to solve the real problems. The confidentiality
of banking should never be an instrument for abuse, tax fraud
or criminal activities. Today we have all the instruments for
fighting money-laundering and tax evasion.'
Mr Villiger added
that the withholding tax system, which has been in place in Switzerland
for the past 50 years, was much more efficient than any other.
Most forms of capital income are subject to this tax at a very
high rate of 35 per cent.
The EU has been particularly
vocal in criticising Swiss banking secrecy in recent months. The
EU wants access to information on EU citizens with Swiss bank
accounts who are suspected of tax fraud. Some analysts have suggested
that Swiss membership of the EU, which is the governments
long-term aim, will be impossible unless the fortress of banking
secrecy is breached. However, Villiger said the EU itself decided
to give its member states the opportunity to choose an information
system or one based on a withholding tax. He said: 'The Europeans
cannot say we are wrong when they allow the same system for their
own union. In 10 years, Im sure they will see that it is
an efficient system.'
For Villiger, the
crux of the matter is that the Swiss people simply do not want
to give up their cherished banking secrecy. He said: 'A persons
confidentiality is a very important principle, especially at a
time when new technology allows you to draw up detailed profiles
of everyone. Every person has a right to be protected. We have
all the tools necessary to avoid abuses, and that is why it is
legitimate to maintain this special professional secrecy. Im
convinced that even if the government proposed moving away from
this system, the people would never say yes.'