Commenting on last week's UK Pre-Budget, John Riches, Chair of STEP's Technical
Committee (The Society of Trusts and Estates Practitioners) deplored the limitations
put on the new self-invested pensions regime.
Said Mr Riches: "Overall, this is a 'steady as she goes' Pre-budget Report
for personal tax and those concerned with the personal taxation industry. The
Government is continuing to target very specific tax avoidance schemes as part
of its general policy commitment to clamp down on tax avoidance. There is nothing
in this Pre-Budget statement that will be a great surprise to those in the industry
- with possible exception of the dramatic about turn on self directed pensions.
It is unfortunate that the Government felt that such significant restrictions
were necessary to this innovative pension reform."
Mr Riches also commented on changes to the 'pre-owned assets' regime, inheritance
tax 'death-bed' planning, and proposals for a new tax on planning gains.
"The Government has announced that the scope of the pre-owned assets regime
will be widened (so as to apply from December 5), to prevent its provisions
being circumvented by 'reverter to settlor' trusts. The Government introduced
a pre-owned assets regime on 6 April 2005, imposing an income tax charge upon
former owners of property who continue to enjoy a benefit from that (or another)
property free of charge or at low cost. The primary purpose of these rules was
to counter inheritance tax planning schemes involving the family home, although
they do have wider application.
"Clients able to unwind their schemes will generally escape pre-owned
assets charges, but will also suffer inheritance tax by reference to the value
of the property in question upon their death (the benefit of the scheme being
undone) unless further planning is possible. Some commentators had suggested
that it may be possible to unwind certain planning structures but then implement
further arrangements using 'reverter to settlor' trusts, the idea being to escape
the pre-owned assets regime in a way that would still secure the desired inheritance
tax advantages. The Government's Pre-Budget Statement will ensure that any such
arrangements will not circumvent the provisions of the pre-owned assets regime.
As regards inheritance tax, Mr Riches said: "The Pre-Budget Statement introduced
measures targeted at UK domiciled persons, whose worldwide assets are generally
subject to inheritance tax, buying an interest as a beneficiary in in a trust
made by non domiciled persons. Such trusts were attractive to UK domiciles because
they were exempt from inheritance tax to the extent that the assets in the trust
were located outside the UK. There have been some marketing schemes encouraging
this practice because there was no requirement of ownership of the interest
in the trust for a minimum period unlike the rules for business assets such
as AIM shares where the exemption only applies after 2 years ownership. So it
was possible literally to engage in "death bed" tax planning.
"The Government is now putting a stop to such schemes by announcing that
where an interest in one of these trusts is bought after 5 December 2005 the
trust will no longer be exempt from inheritance tax."
Owen Clutton, of STEP's Technical Committee said: "From what one can
see it may be the whole trust and not only the interest bought that will be
liable to inheritance tax. So it may be quite a far reaching change."
Mr Riches continued: "As widely predicted in the press prior to the Pre-Budget
Report, the Government is contemplating the introduction of a windfall tax on
property development. This "planning-gain supplement" is the subject
of a consultation paper released to coincide with the Pre-Budget Statement.
Broadly, proposals are as follows: the planning gain will be calculated as the
difference between the value of the land in its original use and its value with
full planning permission at the time permission is granted; the supplement will
be a percentage of the planning gain; the supplement will not be payable until
development is actually commenced; both residential and commercial land will
be subject to the supplement; there will be a threshold below which the supplement
will not apply - this will encompass home improvements and may be extended to
small developments; and the supplement will not be introduced prior to 2008.
"In the context of a Chancellor who has a mantra of tax simplification,
the addition of a new tax that, in many ways, can be seen as a throw back to
the old days of Development Land Tax is a slightly unusual move. However, this
can perhaps be taken as an indication that the existing legislation designed
to tax development land gains is not considered to be as effective as HMRC would
like."