The US Securities and Exchange Commission last week voted to adopt an amendment
to Rule 14a-8(i)(8) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, to codify the
Commission's longstanding interpretation of that rule.
This action was taken to provide certainty to shareholders and companies following
a 2006 decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit which did
not defer to the Commission's interpretation of the rule. It will also ensure
that current disclosure requirements and antifraud protections aren't upended.
"The decision made maintains the status quo of the past decade, preserving
every right that shareholders presently enjoy, while ensuring there is no unintended
breach in the disclosure and antifraud protections applicable to proxy contests,"
explained SEC Chairman Christopher Cox, continuing:
"If the Commission did nothing, then there would be no clear and authoritative
interpretation of our rules. And there would be an easy end run around the Commission's
required disclosures and our antifraud rules in proxy contests. We owe it to
investors and the markets to at least ensure that this does not happen. Now
that we have accomplished our investor protection objectives, I believe we can
move forward and re-open this discussion in 2008 to consider how to strengthen
the proxy rules to better vindicate the fundamental state law rights of shareholders
to elect directors."
John White, the Director of the Division of Corporation Finance, added: "I
believe that investors, registrants and the staff of the Commission will all
benefit from the certainty that the rule clarification the Commission adopted
today will provide. This step is critically important to the application of
the proxy rules for the upcoming annual meeting season."
Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act provides an opportunity for a shareholder
owning a relatively small amount of a company's securities to submit a proposal
for inclusion in a company's proxy materials, provided that the shareholder
complies with certain procedural requirements and the proposal does not fall
within one of thirteen substantive bases for exclusion. One of the thirteen
substantive bases for exclusion, Rule 14a-8(i)(8), permits a company to omit
from its proxy materials any proposal that "relates to an election for
membership on the company's board of directors or analogous governing body."
The Commission voted to amend the language of the rule to read as follows:
"If the proposal relates to a nomination or an election for membership
on the company's board of directors or analogous governing body or a procedure
for such nomination or election." This language was not revised from the
proposal.
The rule amendment will take effect 30 days after it is published in the Federal
Register.