OECD Backs Off Sanctions On Offshore Jurisdictions
by Ulrika Lomas, Tax-News,com, Brussels
21 June 2004
Participants at the meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Taxation in Berlin
earlier this month agreed on a process aimed at achieving high standards of
transparency and information exchange in a way that is fair and equitable and
permits fair tax competition between all countries. The Forum, which was set
up after smaller non-OECD jurisdictions demanded to be involved in global tax
decision-making, brought together representatives from over 40 governments to
discuss proposals developed jointly by members from the OECD and non-OECD countries.
At the Berlin meeting two proposals presented by St. Vincent and the Grenadines
were accepted and adopted by the OECD. A release from the St Vincent Offshore
Finance Authority stated that one of the proposals put forward was primarily
aimed at postponing the discussion on the imposition of sanctions on countries
that fail to comply with the OECD initiative. The St. Vincent and the Grenadines
representative, Louise Mitchell, Executive Director of the local Offshore Finance
Authority, proposed that "given the fact that there are many unresolved
issues on the table, such as the issue of a level playing field, that it was
premature to address the issue of defensive measures." It is the imposition
of such sanctions that would give real weight to the OECD initiative, which
for the time being has been put on hold.
The second proposal was that the OECD should not dictate that countries 'should'
take measures to create a level playing field by the year 2006. It was presented
that while the OECD and non-OECD members pursue benchmarking exercises to determine
the status of the playing field, that the date of 2006, in which countries like
SVG originally agreed to the sharing of civil tax information, should be removed.
The compromise reached was the removal of the date of 2006 and the changing
of the language from 'should' to 'are encouraged'. The removal of the date by
the OECD now leaves open and indefinite the timeframe for the original commitments.
In response to the OECD's continued efforts to 'encourage' countries to move
ahead in the sharing of tax information, St. Vincent and the Grenadines reiterated
its position that it will not seek to actively implement its commitment to the
sharing of tax information, while the issues of the level playing field remain
unresolved.
St. Vincent and the Grenadines indicated that it would not volunteer to be 'the
first off the block' to institute measures that could put SVG at a competitive
disadvantage while countries like Switzerland resist such initiatives.
The OECD has conceded both the date as well as the treatment of the imposition
of sanctions, because they, in short, have not been able to get compliance of
their own member states. The famous EU Savings Tax Directive, which would allow
for the sharing of information among EU states, continues to be resisted by
countries such as Switzerland, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein and Austria and the
USA. The EU is having difficulty implementing even the watered down 'compromise'
Directive. As such, OECD members willingly agreed to postpone OECD deadlines,
as they have not been able to resolve these issues in their home countries.
.
|
|