The head of the Swiss Bankers Association
(SBA), Urs Roth, has told Swiss online news agency, Swissinfo, that the
naming and shaming of banks that have been found to contravene money laundering
rules is a very useful tool for all banking regulators.
Particularly where Switzerland is concerned,
Roth said that this could transform the country's reputation as a jurisdiction
with bank secrecy laws that allow such finanical crimes to take place.
'It's quite an important deterrent for regulators, not only in Switzerland
but worldwide, to name and shame banks which break the rules against corruption
and other financial crimes, in order to make the banks aware that their
reputation is at stake,' he said.
The SBA chief referred to Switzerland's
banking supervisory body, the Federal Banking Commission, which last year
named six banks for failing to display the 'necessary diligence' in processing
the funds, valued at around US4600 million, of the late Nigerian leader,
General Sani Abacha, which are now frozen in the country.
The commission disclosed the identities of
six banks involved. They were Credit Agricole Indosuez, UBP Union Bank
and Warburg Bank, Credit Suisse, Hofmann Bank, and Leu Bank (the latter
three being units of the Credit Suisse Group).
Swissinfo also reports that Roth urged the
government to reveal more details of the procedures carried out in connection
with the freezing of bank accounts suspected of being related to terrorism.
He said that members of the media had complained over the limited amount
of information provided by the authorities when they announced that they
had frozen 24 accounts containing $12 million (SFr19.56 million).
He said: 'I believe it would be useful for
the government to disclose information more openly with regard to the
procedures that they have set up in order to fight financial crime and
to cooperate with the international community. On the other hand, I understand
that the authorities cannot at this point disclose names and accounts
because there's a danger that if this information is disclosed, it would
jeopardise the investigation.'