Maybe Hedge Funds Were Best In 2001 . . . Maybe
by Carla Johnson, Investors Offshore.com
28 December 2001
The Credit Suisse First Boston Tremont hedge fund index for the first 11 months
of the year showed average gains of 3.2% in the 11 months to November, easily
outperforming equity indexes, which averaged a loss of 18.3%; but to get a positive
return on your hedge fund you had to be quite selective - returns ranged from
minus 4.8% on long-short equity funds to plus 15.53% on global macro funds.
And some funds bit the dust in a big way: one of the worst performers, London-based
Weavering Capital - a global macro fund - lost 95% of its value.
Event-driven funds - which bet on takeover bids, bankruptcies and other corporate
restructurings - grew 10.3%; convertible arbitrage funds - which exploit tiny
imbalances in the pricing of related securities - grew by 14.2%.
2001's 3.2% gain has to be compared with an average over the previous seven
years of 11.6% growth; and investors who chose to try to minimise risk by investing
indirectly in the sector through so-called funds of funds, which charge an extra
layer of performance fees, will have done even worse. 'It's been a difficult
year for hedge funds,' said industry expert Jacob Schmidt of Allenbridge. 'Investors
have been protected on the downside, but it has been disappointing on the upside.'
The averages conceal lots of much better or worse results, of course, but on
the whole those investors who have fled equity funds will be congratulating
themselves. The giant, $21.4bn Janus Worldwide Fund, for instance, has fallen
24.5% in value this year, trailing nearly three-quarters of its rivals. However,
it still is ranked at the top of the world stock fund category over the last
10 years, with an average annual return of 14.2%, according to fund tracker
Morningstar Inc. And that beats hedge funds, interestingly, perhaps proving
that in the long run, you can't beat the market. Or again, perhaps not. Who
knows?
.
|
|