New research from Cass Business School in London shows investors who want higher
returns from hedge fund investments that they should sack their overpaid fund
managers and replicate the funds themselves using mechanical futures trading
strategies (or “synthetic funds” for short). In most cases this
will significantly boost returns.
In a large-scale test involving almost 2,500 (funds of) hedge funds, Harry
M. Kat, Professor of Risk Management at Cass, and leading international hedge
fund expert, shows that over the past 15 years, synthetic funds would have outperformed
real (funds of) hedge funds 82% of the time.
Traditionally, hedge fund managers have charged investors extremely high fees,
generally an annual management fee of 2% plus an incentive fee equal to 20%
of profits. Funds of funds add a second layer of fees of on average 1% plus
10% of profits. “In the early days, the high fees came on the back of
15-20% returns,” Professor Kat says. “Things are very different
now; hedge fund returns are routinely around 6 – 7%, basically the same
as a glorified savings account. If fund managers are taken out of the picture,
however, returns can be boosted by 2 or 3%.”
Professor Kat’s research shows that, using purely mechanical futures
trading strategies, it is possible to design synthetic funds which generate
returns with the same risk characteristics as (funds of) hedge funds. Thanks
to their mechanical nature, synthetic funds can be run without involving an
expensive manager. Although this means that investors may miss out on possible
superior trading skills, it also means they avoid the excessive management fees
that come with it.
“The significantly better returns gained by investing in synthetic funds
confirm that efficient risk management and cost control tend to be much more
certain routes to superior performance than trying to beat the market while
paying excessive management and incentive fees.”
Professor Kat argues that since they only trade in the most liquid futures
markets, synthetic funds also avoid all the other typical drawbacks of alternative
investments, such as the need for extensive due diligence, liquidity, capacity,
transparency and style drift problems, as well as possible regulatory problems.
Together with their low management costs, this makes synthetic funds an extremely
attractive alternative to direct investment in hedge funds.
Professor Kat and his colleague Helder Palaro have designed a ‘FundCreator’
system which tells investors how many futures contracts they need to buy or
sell to create returns with the same statistical properties, such as volatility
and degree of correlation with stocks and bonds, as a given hedge fund. While
ultimately returns are in the hands of the investor, realistic backtests indicate
that in some cases they can make a very respectable 10% average return per annum.
Professor Kat predicts the alternative investment market will rapidly move
away from active management over the next 10 years. “20 years ago active
fund management in the traditional investment market was the status quo until
someone came up with a system for managing funds through an index, doing away
with the need for an active manager. Index fund management now accounts for
40% of the traditional investment industry and I predict we will see a similar
market share for synthetic funds 10 years from now.”
Cass Business School, City University, undertakes research of national and
international significance and supports almost 100 PhD students. Cass has the
largest Finance Faculty and the largest Actuarial Science & Statistics Faculty
in Europe. Its finance research is ranked 2nd in Europe and 4th in the World
outside the US by Financial Management Magazine and our insurance and risk research
is ranked 2nd in the world by the Journal of Risk and Insurance.