The long running conflict
over import duties between Japan and China looks as though it may go before
the World Trade Organisation's dispute resolution procedure, as diplomats from
the two countries once again failed to resolve the problem last week.
The dispute began in April
this year, when the Japanese authorities imposed temporary curbs on the importation
of Chinese leeks, shiitake mushrooms, and tatami-mat rushes. The Chinese government
was quick to respond to this slight, and in early June, imposed a 100% import
tariff on Japanese cars, air conditioning units, and mobile phones.
However, the curbs expired
on November 8th, and Japan has until the end of this week to decide whether
to impose full sanctions, for which it must submit detailed proof of China's
infringement of trade rules to the WTO.
Although the two sides seem
to have had problems agreeing on even the venue for talks during this dispute,
and the Chinese Foreign Trade Minister, Shi Guangsheng vowed last week to 'fight
the dispute to the end', many believe that neither party really wants the trade
conflict to end up in front of the World Trade Organisation, especially not
so soon after China's accession to the international body.
Speaking to the South China
Morning Post at the weekend, an un-named diplomat described the prevailing mood:
'Japan does not want to be the first country to take China to the WTO. It is
China's biggest trading partner, after the United States, and next year is the
30th anniversary of bilateral relations,' he explained, adding: 'It is not worth
going to the WTO for leeks, mushrooms, and tatami mats.'
However, it is believed
that if the WTO was forced to rule on the situation, Japan would emerge victorious,
as the value of the Chinese counter-measures is more than three times greater
than the taxes imposed by Tokyo in April.