The slew in Ireland of disclosures, tribunals and investigations relating
to offshore accounts continues in full force this week, with headline-grabbing
disclosures at the Flood and Moriarty tribunals.
The Flood Tribunal this week was hearing evidence about a payment made
to politician Mr Ray Burke, which according to builders Mr Tom Brennan
and Mr Joe McGowan who made it from their Jersey offshore company, Canio,
was openly described as a political donation. But yesterday accountant
Mr Hugh Owens, who advised on the two builders' offshore tax schemes,
told the tribunal that if they had told him that money was going to a
politician it would have 'stuck out like a sore thumb'. If a political
donation had been mentioned - even if Mr Burke's name was not used - he
would have remembered it, he said.
Told that Mr McGowan had also claimed he informed his accountant about
the donation, Mr Owens responded: 'Do you believe everything Joe McGowan
says?' Mr Owens also said auctioneer Mr John Finnegan, also involved in
making the donation, had been 'totally deceived' and 'hoodwinked' in relation
to the political donation. As far as he was concerned, Mr Finnegan was
a 'sleeping partner' in the land deals he collaborated on with Brennan
and McGowan. Mr Owens said he did not keep Mr Finnegan informed of the
details of the deals because the auctioneer was 'coming along on a cheap
ride'.
Mr Owens said there was 'no tax reason' for the elaborate offshore financial
arrangements he designed on the trio's behalf. The reason for the structure
was his clients' desire for 'privacy', he said. The involvement of Brennan
and McGowan and Mr Finnegan in a number of offshore companies had been
concealed through the use of shares held in trust by their solicitors.
The names of the three owners did not appear in any of the company documents.
Mr Owens explained that the reason he recommended this arrangement was
because offshore companies were involved.
Meanwhile, over at the Moriarty tribunal, former minister for transport,
energy and communications, Mr Michael Lowry, told the tribunal he did
not interfere at any level in the process of awarding a mobile phone licence
to Esat Digifone in 1996. But it emerged yesterday during a four-hour
grilling of Mr Lowry by Mr Jerry Healy SC that he has been formally cautioned
in relation to his financial affairs by the Revenue Commissioners.
Mr Lowry made reference to that fact while being questioned about an
offshore account set up in his name in 1996 by his friend, the late Mr
David Austin, a Fine Gael fundraiser, who had lent him money in a private
transaction. During his evidence, Mr Lowry said he was very conscious
of the presence in the body of the tribunal of officials from the Revenue
Commissioners with whom he was dealing and with whom he was 'under caution'.
'I think I must have some constitutional right in relation to the evidence
I give on taxation matters, particularly in regard to the fact that information
already given at this tribunal has been used against me in another forum.'
Responding to the submission, the chairman, Mr Justice Moriarty, said
that the tax affairs of Mr Lowry were not within the remit of the tribunal,
but the circumstances which had arisen had made it 'essential' that the
tribunal inquire 'with some particularity' into all the circumstances
over this period. Insofar as some tax considerations might obtrude, the
tribunal had to examine these 'overall circumstances' carefully.
During questioning, Mr Lowry repeatedly said he did not believe the account
set up in his name in Irish Nationwide (Isle of Man) in late September
1996 was 'relevant' to his accountants, his solicitors or the Revenue
at that time. He had received no benefit from it, and the money had been
repaid, with interest, just over three months later. When he had realised
that it was relevant, he disclosed it to the tribunal in April this year.
A sum of (pounds) 147,000 was transferred to the account by the late
Mr Austin in 1996. Mr Austin obtained a draft in his own name from his
account with Bank of Ireland in Jersey and sent that draft to an official
at the Irish Nationwide (IOM) for lodgment to Mr Lowry's account, the
tribunal heard.
The money, Mr Lowry repeated yesterday, was intended for use for the
refurbishment of the house at 43 Carysfort Avenue, Blackrock, Co Dublin.
It was a loan, at commercial rates. Yet the handwritten document drawn
up by Mr Austin in October 1997, bearing the details of the loan, was
a private document, which Mr Lowry kept in a personal file. It was 'an
agreement between friends', he said.
Counsel however said that the circumstances surrounding the setting up
of a bank account in the Isle of Man by Mr Michael Lowry in 1996 indicated
that he was intent on keeping the account secret.
The contract for the Irish Nationwide account listed the address of Mr
Lowry’s accountant in Blackrock, Co Dublin without their consent.
He also listed his occupation as a company director when, in fact, he
was a Government minister at the time. And Mr Lowry had written on the
contract that there should be no correspondence in relation to the contract
without his request.
Counsel for the tribunal, Mr Jerry Healy SC, told the inquiry that there
was "no possible, credible reason for David Austin to put money in
the offshore account for any other reason other than to keep it secret".
Asked about the payment of $50,000 to Fine Gael at the time of the award
of the license to Esat, Mr Lowry, who was ultimately responsible for the
award of the license, said he knew nothing about how it was raised or
about how it was paid. He believed such a payment from any of the companies
competing for a State mobile phone licence in late 1995 and early 1996
would have been both "wrong and unwise".
The tribunal has previously heard that a payment of $50,000 was made
by Telenor, a partner with Mr Denis O'Brien's firm, Esat Telecom, in the
Esat Digifone company, to an offshore account in Mr Austin's name.