It has been reported in India that the authorities are planning a new tax
law which will include anti-abuse provisions aimed at preventing improper use
of the India-Mauritius Double Tax Avoidance Treaty.
Indian worries about abuse of the residence rules under the Treaty have been
holding up full implementation of a Comprehensive Economic Cooperation and Partnership
Agreement signed last year.
Indian tax officials, with perhaps only lukewarm support from their government,
had been hoping that Mauritius would stiffen the requirements for tax exemptions
under the DTAA. They point to a new protocol Mauritius has added to its treaty
with China under which capital gains arising in Mauritius on the sale of Chinese
assets will be subject to a 10% tax in China in some circumstances. The protocol
came into force on 1st January.
The Indian tax authorities fear particularly that short-term stock market gains
can be sheltered in Mauritius by Indian traders, a practice known as 'round-tripping'.
The Mauritian authorities did move to placate the Indians last year, tightening
up on the issuance of Category 1 Global Business Licence applications for Collective
Investment Schemes, Private Equity Funds, Venture Capital Funds, Investment
Companies, CIS Manager, and Investment Adviser/Managers; but India wanted further
action before it implements parts of the CECPA which will be highly favourable
for Mauritian exports to India.
Mauritius has not done enough, however, and the new law is expected to bring
in provisions to ensure that the benefits of the treaty flow only to genuine
investors, a government source said. Legislation is expected to be introduced
in Parliament in the winter session.
Ernst & Young partner Amitabh Singh said: “Technically speaking,
transfer pricing regulations are also anti-abuse legislation and the Indian
Income-Tax Act already has some anti-abuse provisions, including transfer pricing
in Chapter X of the Act. I presume the government is looking at bringing more
transactions within its purview and framing laws to regulate them. A provision
such as this will help in situations where India does not have a DTAA. Even
if there is a DTAA, the department will be able to rely upon these provisions.”