Hong Kong Investment Experts Recommend Closed-End Funds
by Carla Johnson, Investors Offshore.com
25 September 2001
Investment experts in Hong
Kong are recommending that mutual fund investors blocked from trading their
funds in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in the United States consider
investing in closed-end funds as a viable alternative, but are warning investors
to be aware of the risks, according to a Wall Street Journal report.
Although closed-end funds
are scarce in Asia - there are only 17 listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange,
compared with over 1,900 mutual funds, they hold distinct advantages for investors
in volatile times. Many large mutual fund houses closed trading temporarily
in all of their funds following the US attacks, despite the fact that for some,
the majority exposure was in Europe and Asia, where markets were still open.
The liquidity of a closed-end
fund, however, comes from the market rather than from a fund company, so theoretically,
as long as the exchange is open and the underlying fund assets are tradable,
closed end fund shares can be traded as easily as stocks. With closed-end funds,
it is also sometimes possible to make a profit not only on the increase in the
value of the underlying portfolio, but also on the price of the fund's shares,
which as there are only a certain number issued, can rise with investor sentiment
and demand.
However, there are also
risks which investors must be aware of, say experts. Closed end funds tend to
be less liquid than their mutual fund counterparts, and operating expenses are
often higher. 'Closed-end funds are a lot more expensive than mutual funds,'
Towry Law senior asset management executive David Chapman warned in the Wall
Street Journal. 'The bid-offer spread can be as wide as 10% at times, particularly
in an illiquid market.'
.
|
|