According to new research issued by two academics at the University of
Reading in the UK, indices for hedge fund returns are flattered because
a high percentage of funds don't survive for very many years. Thus the
indices display what the researchers call 'suvivorship bias' and over-estimate
the retruns actually achievable on an average basis.
' Welcome to the Dark Side: Hedge Fund Attrition and Survivorship Bias
Over the Period 1994-2001', written by Harry Kat and Gaurav Amin of the
University of Reading says that more than two in five hedge funds fail
to survive for five years. The report says that only 59.5% of hedge funds
around five years ago are still operating, and this attrition rate is
increasing. Five years ago, 93.8% of funds survived until the end of the
year; last year, the proportion dropped to 87.7%.
The main reasons, says the report, seem to be lack of size and lack of
performance. Small funds do not generate sufficient fees to make managers'
jobs worthwhile. Underperforming funds find it difficult to attract investors
and managers do not earn performance fees from funds that generate poor
returns.
Global macro funds have shown the highest attrition rate. This seems
to relate to problems experienced during the Asian and Russian crises
of 1998. The lowest attrition rate was in convertible arbitrage and event-driven
funds but the authors say: "One should be careful not to read too
much into these results as they appear to be heavily influenced by a small
number of major events, which are unlikely to repeat themselves in the
near future."