Now that George Bush
is beginning to put his administration team in place, Washington
is in a ferment of speculation, and nowhere more so than in guessing
who will be Treasury Secretary. Rumours that Bush would reach
out across party lines to invite Larry Summers to stay on for
a few months can safely be ascribed to mischievous Democrat scribblers,
but reports of Republican talent scouts seen prowling Wall Street
are more credible. Whoever gets the top job at the Treasury will
however be in thrall to Lawrence Lindsey, a former Fed governor,
who will play the role of economic maestro, probably from a position
in the White House, and of course to Alan Greenspan at the Federal
Reserve, now more than ever a monument of economic credibility.
In addition, with
an evenly-divided Congress, economic policy-making in the new
administration will require a balancing act of masterly skill,
and one should not expect outcomes to depart much from the middle
ground. Although Vice-President-elect Dick Cheney said two weeks
ago that the US was 'on the front edge of a recession' and that
large tax cuts might be needed, House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert
said yesterday that he did not favor President-elect George Bush's
much-touted $1.3 trillion across-the-board tax cut.
Instead, Mr. Hastert
said he would push for the House to act on tax cuts aimed more
narrowly at married couples and heirs (meaning the 'death' tax
presumably), an approach that had bipartisan support this year
in Congress but was rejected by President Clinton. "I would
think that the first few pieces of tax relief that we attempt
will be incremental," Mr. Hastert said. "But we haven't
really sat down and talked about this in any depth. We are most
successful, especially in tax policy, when we start to take tax
ideas and do them a piece at a time," he added.
Lawrence Lindsey
is known to believe that tax cuts are needed in the interests
of structural reform of the economy, but thinks that they are
an ineffective way of addressing a short-term demand management
problem. He approves of Alan Greenspan's management of the economy,
and is unlikely to make the mistake of interfering in the Fed's
demand management strategy - something tried unsuccessfully by
George Bush's father in the last republican administration.
Wall Street expects
that Mr Bush will offer a trimmed-back version of the $1.3 trillion
tax cut in exchange for some of the spending increases espoused
by the outgoing administration, hoping to achieve bi-partisan
agreement in Congress. Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican
of Iowa, the future chairman of the Finance Committee, which oversees
tax legislation, also advocated the step-by-step approach. Mr.
Grassley said the political reality of a 50-50 split in the Senate
would make the more ambitious plan difficult to pass, at least
so long as the economy stays strong.
So far as is known,
there has yet to be any direct contact between Mr. Bush and Congressional
leaders. An aide, Ari Fleischer said: "It was right when
he announced it (the tax cutting plan), and he believes it is
even more right in the economic downturn. And he hopes to work
with the Congress in bipartisan spirit to implement it."
One player in the
decision will of course be the economy, both in terms of the size
of the projected surplus, which is one more time expected to be
larger when the next set of figures is released, and in terms
of what happens to growth. Some Republicans are even half-welcoming
to an economic downturn which would increase the chances of getting
a large tax cut.