At
a London conference last week the author of the UK Government's
'Edwards Report' on the Dependent Territories of Jersey, Guernsey
and the Isle of Man, Mr Andrew Edwards, gave his opinions about
the likely outcome of the current manoeuverings going on between
international bodies such as the OECD and the EU and the offshore
centres.
Mr Edwards foresees that the offshore
centres will fall into two groups: 'good' ones, which will
reach an accommodation with the 'powers that be', and will consequently
be an accepted and useful part of the global financial tapestry;
and 'bad' ones, that don't co-operate, and will attract only not-good
business. He thinks that 'good' centres will eventually have to
accept a fair degree of transparency through exchange of information
and mutual assistance treaties with the high-tax countries, but
that the quid pro quo will be that they are allowed to continue
to offer low-tax regimes to those companies and individuals that
are able to take advantage of them. The 'secret' business (ie
tax evaders, money-launderers etc) will migrate to the 'bad' centres
which will be the subject of sanctions by the high-tax countries.
Although Andrew Edwards is retired,
the general opinion among speakers and delegates afterwards was
that his opinions are very likely to be close to the mainstream
of Governmental thinking.
Among the other highlights of
the conference were presentations by Peter Cussons of PwC,
Klaus Eicher from Deloittes in Munich, Kolm Kelly and Una Tighe's
Irish double act, and Professor Gunther Strunk from Hamburg University.
Peter Cussons' talk on Global
Taxation Trends included details of the closed meeting of
the EU's 'Code of Conduct' Committee chaired by UK Treasury Minister
Dawn Primarolo on 12th November at which the final list of 'unfair
tax practices' was agreed for presentation to the Ecofin Council
meeting on November 29th. The original 200 + measures have been
whittled down to 61. The UK has emerged scot-free (20 UK measures
were on the original list), although the dependent territories
are still targeted on a number of measures. Surprisingly, the
Luxembourg 'SOPARFI' holding company is not on the list, although
Peter Cussons added the word 'yet', since only the Council of
Ministers can make the final decision.
Both Andrew Edwards and Peter
Cussons emphasized that the whole 'Code of Conduct' directive,
which includes desirable relaxations of the cross-border rules
on royalties and licensing payments along with the withholding
tax and the unfair practices list, probably stands or falls as
a unit, as there is no EU-wide agreement to pass anything but
a full version of the proposals.
Klaus Eicher explored the characteristics
of a 'net-centric' corporation, which may not have a fixed structure
over time, and which will certainly be flat, with many more expatriate
executives who can take advantage (like their companies) of offshore
opportunities. He summarised a prevailing theme of the conference
when he said that the current legislative situation was frustrating
for clients and advisers alike: 'Yes, this structure might not
trigger a tax in the target country provided that the following
26 conditions are fulfilled; but there is a risk that the tax
authorities will take a different approach.'
Kolm Kelly and Una Tighe made
out a convincing case for Ireland's quasi-offshore e-future. As
an onshore EU jurisdiction with an agreed low-tax regime, and
e-commerce-friendly legislation that is ahead of anything else
in the EU, Ireland is experiencing a boom in e-commerce development.
Speakers from Jersey and the Isle of Man were equally enthusiastic
about their e-commerce regimes - we are probably going to witness
a lively competition between a number of the leading offshore
jurisdictions to corner the various different types of e-commerce
and e-business that can migrate offshore.
Professor Strunk, one of the top
names in e-academia, reviewed the confusing patchwork of p.e.
(permanent establishment) and cfc regimes in the main OECD countries,
and how (for instance) a German company could e-nable itself tax
effectively in this jungle. He recalled Jean-Baptiste Colbert's
bon mot about the art of taxation (plucking geese to get the most
feathers with the least hissing), but observed that (as the Economist
pointed out) there has been one big change: unlike geese, in the
17th century people didn't know how to fly; now they can!