The Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) is soliciting views
from the investment management industry on whether hedge fund indices should
be classified as financial indices for the purposes of UCITS, the EU framework
for cross-border investment funds.
According to the Committee, the decision to explore more thoroughly the potential
inclusion of hedge fund indices in UCITS should be seen as part of the wider
context of CESR’s final advice to the European Commission on clarification
of definitions concerning eligible assets for investments of UCITS submitted
in January 2006, which set out in detail its views on the criteria that should
be met by a financial index for derivatives, in order for the index to be an
eligible investment.
The CESR last week published a consultation paper entitled: 'Clarification
of the definitions concerning eligible assets for investment by UCITS: can hedge
fund indices be classified as financial indices for the purpose of UCITS?'. This
consultation closes on 16 April, 2007; prior to that, a public meeting will be held to
discuss the issue on 2 April, 2007.
The measures proposed will be adopted by CESR at "level 3". At level
1, the UCITS Directive governs the overall framework for the operation of EU-harmonised
collective investment undertakings. A level 2 implementing Directive on eligible
assets clarifies certain definitions in the UCITS Directive that are related
to eligible assets, including financial indices. ‘Level 3’ measures
concern strengthened co-operation between (national) regulators to ensure consistent
and equivalent application of ‘Level 1’ and ‘Level 2’
legislation.
At this stage, the CESR said that on the issue of hedge fund indices diversification,
taking into account that the diversification requirement set out in the UCITS
Directive requires the index to have at least five underlyings, CESR considers
there is no need for additional level 3 guidelines.
It is proposed that a hedge fund index will not meet the criterion of "representing
an adequate benchmark" if the UCITS does not verify that the index provider:
clearly defines and makes publicly available an explanation of what the index
is trying to represent, and assesses whether the methodology of the index construction
will affect the extent to which it
is representative for the market to which it refers.
It is also proposed that the criterion of "publication in an appropriate
manner" will not be met unless the UCITS confirms that the index provider
makes publicly available the full methodology of the index and the UCITS verifies
that the index will be subject to an independent audit at least annually.
The CESR considers that index methodology and standards will probably develop
over time. In this respect, CESR proposes to monitor the evolution of the market
to consider which measures might be necessary to cope with market developments.