The furore over the
OECD and Financial Action Task Force (FATF) blacklists, published
six months ago, continues unabated, especially in the Caribbean
nations. The Bahamas' was hit particularly hard by the OECD's
initiative on supposed "harmful" tax regimes and the
FATF's hitlist of jurisdictions deemed un-cooperative in the international
fight against money laundering. Last week two top-level Bahamian
politicians proffered their own explanations as to why the Bahamas'
incurred the wrath of the G-7 powers.
Bahamian opposition
MP Bradley Roberts last week called on the government to resign
over the OECD and FATF debacle, claiming that the blacklisting
of the Caribbean nation was directly related to drug issues, or
more precisely the government's inability to deal with drug trafficking.
In a House of Assembly debate on the Central Bank of the Bahamas
Act 2000, he said Deputy Prime Minister Frank Watson had admitted
the failure of the Tracing and Forfeiture Act because the
Act had only been used in a few instances. Mr Roberts charged:
'Why hasnt there been more cases brought under this Act?
You have had one or two failures, so you give up, you throw your
hands up, you do not proceed to make any amendments to close any
loopholes, you just simply allow it to flourish.'
Mr Roberts said that
asking the government to resign was a fair request. He stated:
'Either it resigns or risks being jailed by the very laws being
enacted under the cloud of blacklisting.' He was particularly
critical of the government for its handling of the growing trade
in illegal drugs and quoted from a recent speech by Assistant
Commissioner Reginald Ferguson on money laundering. The Assistant
Commissioner had said that money laundering and the proceeds from
drug trafficking had distorted the Bahamian economy with the result
that the economy now appears healthier than it is.
However, the Minister
of Economic Affairs, Carl Bethel, said last week that the Bahamas'
blacklisting was due to the loss of control of funds placed offshore.
More than one trillion dollars pass through offshore financial
centres, and Mr Bethel claims that the major world economies,
ie the G-7 nations, have reacted to the loss of substantial investment
dollars by clamping down on offshore jurisdictions such as the
Bahamas. Mr Bethel feels that the OECD initiative has more to
do with the loss of control over those funds than with the tax
question.
Mr Bethel, who accompanied
Bahamian Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham on his recent trip around
Europe to discuss the blacklisting issue, refutes the claims of
Bradley Roberts. In the House of Assembly last week, he said that
many other countries, including Israel, were on the blacklists,
and there was no suggestion that they were included because of
drug trafficking.
With regards the
issue of control of offshore funds, Mr Bethel said: 'When an investor
buys stock and bonds, what does he do? He pays money to the government
and he receives what they call "government paper."'
In the case of France, he said, if one billion dollars are siphoned
off to offshore centres around the world, that means that the
French government is unable to access that money. He continued:
'Thats a billion dollars they cannot borrow from their financial
markets... that cannot be used to fund the development of their
country. It is in some offshore centre being managed by someone
who may not feel patriotic about it... and so that is a loss of
the savings of these countries to the offshore markets.'
Referring to a recent report on the growth of offshore funds,
Mr Bethel stated: 'Just one fund was seeded with capital in excess
of US$32bn. And that is big, big money.'