Tory Peer and former Party
Treasurer, Lord Ashcroft, announced on Thursday that he had triumphed in a bitter
battle with International Development Secretary Clare Short over tax breaks
received by his business empire, which has been based in Belize since the late
1980s.
As a result of a lucrative
exemption, Lord Ashcroft pays very little tax to the Belize government, a situation
which Clare Short was intent on changing, by threatening to withhold millions
of punds of debt relief to the country. She argued at the time that there was
little point in waiving the debts to help the country's suffering population
if the government was voluntarily forgoing tax revenue.
Ms Short recently announced
that she was prepared to write off £10 million worth of Belize's debts
if it agreed to reform its financial regime, and end the tax relief enjoyed
by Lord Ashcroft's companies. However, the government failed to act, and as
a result, the citizens of the already impoverished country stand to lose out
still further.
A spokesman for Lord Ashcroft,
who has claimed in the past that Ms Short's actions have constituted a 'Get
Ashcroft' campaign, criticised the withdrawal of debt relief:
'The government is punishing
Belize- a country hit by two hurricanes- by refusing to allow any relief from
debt. This dog in the manger attitude is just punishing the people of Belize
because the government would not agree to Britain's demands,' Alan Kilkenhy
said last week.
However, there have been
whispers that the UK government's decision, although influenced by the Ashcroft
case, has been swayed by other concerns regarding the country's financial regulatory
regime. US government documents released in the wake of the September 11th terrorist
attacks also suggested that the authorities there had concerns.