A tax research centre linked to the University of Oxford has urged the UK government
to carefully consider the views of business in its review of the corporate tax
system.
The new report on Interest Deductibility for UK Corporation Tax, released by
the Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation at Saïd Business School
on Tuesday, comes shortly after Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown announced
in the pre-Budget report last week a new consultation with business in 2007
on a package of reform of corporation tax.
In its first report, the institution, which was set up last year and received
funding from the Hundred Group of top UK companies, predicts that the review
could lead to fundamental reforms, and it said that the extent to which interest
payments continue to be deductible from corporate profit is likely to be an
important element of this reform, especially in the light of recent judgments
by the European Court of Justice.
The report concluded from interviews with the tax directors of 14 large multinational
groups in the UK that a proposal to simply reducing the rate of tax relief on
interest from the current rate of 30% to 15% was not supported by business.
Such a reform would be likely to impose considerable costs, and reduce the attractiveness
of the UK as a location for economic activity, it found.
However, the report suggested that there was some support for a reform which
reduced the rate of relief on interest payments to 15%, as long as the rate
charged on interest received was also reduced to 15%. Most considered that this
would be sufficiently competitive to substantially reduce the incentive for
offshore financial planning.
In addition, if foreign repatriated profits were not taxed in the UK, then
dividend repatriation to the UK would also be encouraged, the report stated.
The survey found some support for a form of interest apportionment to restrict
relief to interest on borrowing which finances activity in the UK. However,
a consensus amongst tax directors was that it would be impossible to introduce
any form of apportionment in practice without creating considerable administrative
and compliance cost, and uncertainty.